×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 17 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Studio Ghibli Name Change Considered


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RezSav



Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 542
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:31 am Reply with quote
"However when Suzuki told Miyazaki this, Miyazaki became angry and told Suzuki, 'I'll do it.'" And BAM! That's how he got him out of retirement.

Seriously, though, I would object to Ghibli being renamed "Scirocco." Not because it sounds "weak", and I don't think it does, I just don't like it.


Last edited by RezSav on Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Colonel Wolfe



Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 370
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:38 am Reply with quote
This is a slap in the face. Studio Ghibli is a recognizable name when it comes to the anime industry. To change the name of the studio would be an insult. Studio Ghibli is an established and very well known name where anime fans are concerned and many fans have come to associate Miyazaki-san with this studio. This would be like changing the name of the Walt Disney company to American Animation Studios, there's just no brand name recognition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrno2



Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 6171
Location: USA
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:39 am Reply with quote
RezSav wrote:
"However when Suzuki told Miyazaki this, Miyazaki became angry and told Suzuki, 'I'll do it.'" And BAM! That's how he got him out of retirement.

Seriously, though, I would object to Ghibli being renamed "Scirocco." Not because it sounds "weak", I just don't like it.


Hahahahahahaha!!! Hoo boy. I guess 'Studio Ghibli' wont be able to do much changes with 'Miyazaki' around. Studio Scirocco? That just doesn't cut it. Considering years ago they used to be called 'Studio Totoro'. Nah, stay with 'Ghibli'. It just holds that household feel. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Malintex Terek
Guest




PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:46 am Reply with quote
Colonel Wolfe wrote:

This is a slap in the face. Studio Ghibli is a recognizable name when it comes to [japanese cartoons]. To change the name of the studio would be an insult. Studio Ghibli is an established and very well known name where [cartoon fans] are concerned and many fans have come to associate Miyazaki-san with this studio. This would be like changing the name of the Walt Disney company to American Animation Studios, there's just no brand name recognition.


I fixed your post. "Anime" still doesn't officially exist in America; they're still Japanese cartoons as far as the vast majority of the media-eating populace is concerned.
Back to top
The Naked Beast



Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 1028
Location: A Blue Planet
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:07 pm Reply with quote
When the word Scirocco comes to mind, I think of Paptimus Scirocco, one of the villians in Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam. Could Miyazaki be a Gundam fan?

Renaming Studio Ghibli to Studio Scirocco just does not sound right. It just does not have that ring to it like the word Ghibli does. It is really hard to describe it in words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Colonel Wolfe



Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 370
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:31 pm Reply with quote
Malintex Terek, what is your problem. Japanese anime released in the United States is still anime. To insult the anime genre as basic Japanese cartoons is an insult to anime fans everywhere. Oh, and don't insult my intelligence by trying to 'fix' my posted message.

On this note, everyone here would agree with me that the Japanese do not, nor have they ever made, cartoons. Cartoons is a generic description used to explain animation made outside of Japan.

From Wikipedia:

Quote:
Anime (アニメ, Anime?) is an abbreviation of the Japanese word アニメーション (animēshon), which is based on the English word "animation." Outside Japan, the term most popularly refers to the medium of animation originating in Japan, with distinctive character and background aesthetics that visually set it apart from other forms of animation (e.g. Walt Disney films, Warner Bros. short cartoons). Within Japan, the term anime is used to refer to all forms of animation from around the world. While some anime is entirely hand-drawn, computer assisted animation techniques are, in recent years, quite common. Storylines are typically fictional; examples of anime representing most major genres of fiction exist. Anime is broadcast on television, distributed on media such as DVD and VHS, or included in computer and video games. Anime is often influenced by Japanese comics known as manga. Some anime storylines have been adapted into live action films and television series.


Wikipedia on Cartoons:

Quote:
Because of the stylistic similarities between comic strips and early animated movies, "cartoon" came to refer to animation, and this is the sense in which "cartoon" is most commonly used today. These are usually shown on television or in cinemas and are created by showing illustrated images in rapid succession to give the impression of movement. (In this meaning, the word cartoon is sometimes shortened to " toon " and was popularized by the movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit). Although the term can be applied to any animated presentation, it is most often used in reference to programs for children, featuring anthropomorphized animals, superheroes, the adventures of child protagonists, and other related genres. Animated material which does not fit the traditional conventions of mainstream Western animation, such as Japanese anime are often confused with the definition of cartoons. Anime comprises an entirely different genre in and of itself, giving it a distinguishable quality setting it apart from other cartoons.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10421
Location: Do not message me for support.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:30 pm Reply with quote
Colonel Wolfe wrote:
On this note, everyone here would agree with me that the Japanese do not, nor have they ever made, cartoons. Cartoons is a generic description used to explain animation made outside of Japan.


I disagree. Cartoons is an english word more or less synonymous with "animation" but carrying a slight connotation towards silly and childish animation. Cartoon carries no geographic connotation at all, it is not specific to, nor does it exclude animation from any geographic area.

Japanese people use the word "anime" much the same way we use the word "cartoon." In Japan, anime is animation from all over the world, including Japan, and in the English speaking world, "cartoons" are animation from all over the world, including the english speaking world, and Japan.

Regardless of whether or not it is anime, Hamtaro will always be a cartoon. If you want to argue that non-kodomo anime are not cartoons, it would only be reasonable to also say that Family Guy and Futurama are not cartoons.

Wikipedia's (very subjective) definition would include Hamtaro as a cartoon becuase it fits the traditional definition of Cartoon.

-t


Last edited by Tempest on Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10421
Location: Do not message me for support.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:32 pm Reply with quote
Colonel Wolfe wrote:
This is a slap in the face.


Who's getting slapped, and who's doing the slapping ? I don't see how it is an insult when Miyazaki himself wants to change his own studio's name...

I'm glad he didn't, but only because I've grown attached to the name "Ghibli." The sentimental attachment and brand value of "Ghibli" is the only reason its any better that Scirocco.

-t
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
penguintruth



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8461
Location: Penguinopolis
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:42 pm Reply with quote
With the studio renaming, will they be building mobile suits out by Jupiter?

Sunrise/Bandai may object.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Fiction Alchemist



Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 438
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:11 pm Reply with quote
DELETED.

Last edited by Fiction Alchemist on Thu Sep 08, 2022 8:51 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deltakiral



Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 3338
Location: Glendora, CA (Avatar Hei from Darker than BLACK)
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:17 pm Reply with quote
I'm also against the name change there is something about saying it's a Studio Ghibli film that just sounds right.....Scirocco sounds like some sort joke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
Colonel Wolfe



Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 370
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:28 pm Reply with quote
Tempest, it wasn't general description that I was calling an insult. I was referring to Malintex Terek broad statement that Japanese anime isn't anime in the United States.

Malintex Terek stated that Japanese anime, which is released into the United States as licensed to companies such as ADV Films, Geneon, Bandai and so forth isn't anime because anime only exists in Japan. Since its licensed for distribution in the United States, his statement says that its not anime, that's what I disagree with.

Apparently, anime released in the United States are just cartoons and shouldn't be classified as anime.

I understand where you're coming from, Tempest, and I apologize for not being more clear on the issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tenchi



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 4471
Location: Ottawa... now I'm an ex-Anglo Montrealer.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:18 pm Reply with quote
I don't blame the staff for objecting: they'd be downgrading the name from that of a Maserati to that of a simple Volkswagen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Malintex Terek
Guest




PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:37 pm Reply with quote
Colonel Wolfe wrote:
Malintex Terek, what is your problem. Japanese anime released in the United States is still anime. To insult the anime genre as basic Japanese cartoons is an insult to anime fans everywhere. Oh, and don't insult my intelligence by trying to 'fix' my posted message.


OH DEAR HIGHER POWER, I INSULTED SOME ANIME FANS. IF I'M NOT CAREFUL, THEY COULD "BLOG" ME TO DEATH!

...

Stop deluding yourself; anime isn't mainstream and doesn't have a mainstream label. Most people who watch Ghibli do not associate it with the "devil's cartoons" that radical protestant fundamentalist evangelical Christians like to denounce; they see Ghibli works as merely animated cartoons done by a Japanese director and animated by a Japanese studio. There's nothing extra super-duper "special" connotations or brand labels, aside from the "Studio Ghibli" name, that ring bells in the back of the average consumer's mind when they see such.

When a Newsweek article mentions The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and calls the show a "japanese cartoon", it's a fair implication that a clear distinction between "western cartoons" and "anime" has not been firmly established. Granted, the label no longer has the negative elitist otaku connotations that it once had, but it's still a looooooong way from entering popular culture diction.
Back to top
Bl00dHoUnD



Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 95
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:58 pm Reply with quote
Malintex Terek wrote:
Colonel Wolfe wrote:
Malintex Terek, what is your problem. Japanese anime released in the United States is still anime. To insult the anime genre as basic Japanese cartoons is an insult to anime fans everywhere. Oh, and don't insult my intelligence by trying to 'fix' my posted message.


OH DEAR HIGHER POWER, I INSULTED SOME ANIME FANS. IF I'M NOT CAREFUL, THEY COULD "BLOG" ME TO DEATH!

...

Stop deluding yourself; anime isn't mainstream and doesn't have a mainstream label. Most people who watch Ghibli do not associate it with the "devil's cartoons" that radical protestant fundamentalist evangelical Christians like to denounce; they see Ghibli works as merely animated cartoons done by a Japanese director and animated by a Japanese studio. There's nothing extra super-duper "special" connotations or brand labels, aside from the "Studio Ghibli" name, that ring bells in the back of the average consumer's mind when they see such.

When a Newsweek article mentions The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya and calls the show a "japanese cartoon", it's a fair implication that a clear distinction between "western cartoons" and "anime" has not been firmly established. Granted, the label no longer has the negative elitist otaku connotations that it once had, but it's still a looooooong way from entering popular culture diction.


Props for the stereotyping in the first sentence there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group