×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 1 year old before posting.

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Shonen Jump Magazine Launches 4 New Manga in Next 4 Weeks


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BaronViolet



Joined: 27 May 2018
Posts: 212
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 10:58 am Reply with quote
4 new titles. Four future cancellations
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DamianSalazar



Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 724
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 11:24 am Reply with quote
BaronViolet wrote:
4 new titles. Four future cancellations


And the Negative Nancies have rolled out. At least read some before judging.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WANNFH



Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 1708
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 11:40 am Reply with quote
BaronViolet wrote:
4 new titles. Four future cancellations
Well, at least Nisio getting back in the Jump can look fun, considering Medaka Box.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hoppy800



Joined: 09 Aug 2013
Posts: 3331
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 11:51 am Reply with quote
DamianSalazar wrote:
BaronViolet wrote:
4 new titles. Four future cancellations


And the Negative Nancies have rolled out. At least read some before judging.


WSJ is much more cutthroat lately, even though they don't Thanos snap manga so early anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WANNFH



Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 1708
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 11:58 am Reply with quote
Hoppy800 wrote:
WSJ is much more cutthroat lately, even though they don't Thanos snap manga so early anymore.
Well, who is to blame that literally all of 2022 releases outside Akane-Banashi and RuriDragon actually sucked so hard in ToC ratings and sales that honestly there is nothing to be done except putting the axe on them as fast as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yune Amagiri



Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 941
Location: France
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 12:22 pm Reply with quote
If only switching to Jump+ could be their main alternative over axing way to early when they don't reach quota soon enough. Anyway i will read all of them as always so Godspeed to the creators.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
KarlFranz



Joined: 17 Jun 2019
Posts: 180
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 12:28 pm Reply with quote
BaronViolet wrote:
@DamianSalazar cut-LL


WSJ did give them a chance, they just failed to gain an audience. If you can attract readers with 2 volumes worth of story, then maybe the problem is your series just suck. No reader gonna said :"these 2 volumes is bad but I will keep buying it until it get good"/ Most people drop a manga by the first volume if it failed to grap them. It not suprise that all the cancelled series sold terrible and rank terrible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DamianSalazar



Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 724
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 12:35 pm Reply with quote
BaronViolet wrote:
@DamianSalazar cut-LL


They gave them a chance. The authors wasted the editor-in-chief's time by performing awfully with readers. the longer they stay the longer they are preventing newer authors from getting their shot.

Hoppy800 wrote:
DamianSalazar wrote:
BaronViolet wrote:
4 new titles. Four future cancellations


And the Negative Nancies have rolled out. At least read some before judging.


WSJ is much more cutthroat lately, even though they don't Thanos snap manga so early anymore.


Even then it seems like the older series (barring One Piece, JJK, and Sakamoto Days) are appearing in the backpages more often.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lossthief
ANN Reviewer


Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 1397
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 12:48 pm Reply with quote
Yune Amagiri wrote:
If only switching to Jump+ could be their main alternative over axing way to early when they don't reach quota soon enough. Anyway i will read all of them as always so Godspeed to the creators.


I get why people want this, but there's not really any good reason why they would move things over to Jump+. Sure, Jump+ doesn't have a physical limit to the number of series it can host, but there is a limit to the amount of editorial manpower the publisher can commit to it, same as any other magazine. If a series is failing in the main magazine - aka the largest print publication in manga - there's no reason to think it would suddenly start getting dedicated readership once it's digital-only and still competing for readership with not only the regular WSJ lineup, but the Jump+ catalogue as well. So why continue devoting editors, assistants, and marketing resources to a failing series when you can move those to new series that at least have a theoretical chance of doing better?

As for the new series, I'm interested to see Taizan 5's new work. I wasn't wild about Takopi's Original Sin, but it was certainly unique and ambitious, so I'm curious to see what they'll make next. I'm also interested in Jinzo Ningen 100. The other two...not so much. I can't stand Nisio Isin's writing at the best of times, and Medaka Box was hot garbage. Meanwhile Hayashi's new thing seems to be another gag series, and I really didn't like the humor in I'm From Japan so I think that's gonna be a pass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shay Guy



Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 2131
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 1:09 pm Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:
As for the new series, I'm interested to see Taizan 5's new work. I wasn't wild about Takopi's Original Sin, but it was certainly unique and ambitious, so I'm curious to see what they'll make next.


And for anyone feeling pessimistic, Takopi was one of Jump+'s biggest hits despite being only two volumes, so this mangaka's proven an ability to grab an audience quickly.

lossthief wrote:
I can't stand Nisio Isin's writing at the best of times, and Medaka Box was hot garbage.


I compared it to a NaNoWriMo project when I was reading it, but it could certainly be an interesting one. (Maybe I should get back to it sometime; I got like three-quarters of the way through, around the point where spoiler[the villain declared that from then on, it'd be a crappy romance manga instead of a crappy battle manga].)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DamianSalazar



Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 724
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 1:31 pm Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:
Yune Amagiri wrote:
If only switching to Jump+ could be their main alternative over axing way to early when they don't reach quota soon enough. Anyway i will read all of them as always so Godspeed to the creators.


I get why people want this, but there's not really any good reason why they would move things over to Jump+. Sure, Jump+ doesn't have a physical limit to the number of series it can host, but there is a limit to the amount of editorial manpower the publisher can commit to it, same as any other magazine. If a series is failing in the main magazine - aka the largest print publication in manga - there's no reason to think it would suddenly start getting dedicated readership once it's digital-only and still competing for readership with not only the regular WSJ lineup, but the Jump+ catalogue as well. So why continue devoting editors, assistants, and marketing resources to a failing series when you can move those to new series that at least have a theoretical chance of doing better?


Besides I think new creators have a better shot of building their notoriety on a site like Twitter or pixiv before a major publisher acquires it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gem-Bug



Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Posts: 1216
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 1:43 pm Reply with quote
Like others have said, these series, every series they run gets it's chance. But the metrics/bar WSJ seem to be using are really high, maybe always have been. Series need to perform well right away, maintain it, and likely need to be something that can be adapted to an anime down the line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JoelBurger





PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 1:48 pm Reply with quote
Hoppy800 wrote:
DamianSalazar wrote:
BaronViolet wrote:
4 new titles. Four future cancellations


And the Negative Nancies have rolled out. At least read some before judging.


WSJ is much more cutthroat lately, even though they don't Thanos snap manga so early anymore.


WSJ has always been this cutthroat. Hand's lasted a whole 10 chapters back in 2006.
Back to top
simona.com



Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Tokyo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 2:24 pm Reply with quote
JoelBurger wrote:


WSJ has always been this cutthroat. Hand's lasted a whole 10 chapters back in 2006.


I loved that series (TωT)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheSleepyMonkey



Joined: 11 Jul 2022
Posts: 901
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:54 pm Reply with quote
I liked Medaka Box, so I'm curious to see what Nishio does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group