×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Who Can Beat Goku? The Monumental Legacy of Akira Toriyama




Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tintor2



Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 1824
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:41 am Reply with quote
Considering Goku is really Toriyama's legacy, I wonder Super will keep using him or change to somebody else. The movie Super Hero finally tried to stay away from abusing the characters of Goku and Vegeta but the manga insists they should be everywhere. There is the case of Uub but Toei treated him horribly in GT. I remember hearing that Toriyama doesn't like the heroic portrayal Toei gave the character (especially in the English dub) so that's why he felt more selfish and cocky in Super when compared to Z.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 5925
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:42 am Reply with quote
tintor2 wrote:
Considering Goku is really Toriyama's legacy, I wonder Super will keep using him or change to somebody else. The movie Super Hero finally tried to stay away from abusing the characters of Goku and Vegeta but the manga insists they should be everywhere. There is the case of Uub but Toei treated him horribly in GT. I remember hearing that Toriyama doesn't like the heroic portrayal Toei gave the character (especially in the English dub) so that's why he felt more selfish and cocky in Super when compared to Z.


If he had a problem with that why did he write Goku the way he wrote him in the first half of the original manga? Where Goku more or less had heroic qualities.

- Courageous
- Defends the weak
- Helps those in trouble
- Selfless
- Saves the world sometimes secondary to a primary purpose but still.

Any of the more dubious things he did like throwing Gohan to Cell, helping irredeemable people with body counts he’s also to blame for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lord Geo



Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 2547
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:49 am Reply with quote
Quote:
Akira Toriyama was inspired by the works of amazing mangaka like Osamu Tezuka.


To expand on this for Grant, the interesting thing about Toriyama is that, by his own admission, he really didn't read much manga prior to entering the industry. He read manga when he was in elementary school (i.e. the early-to-mid 60s), but once he got older he actually stopped & stuck exclusively to movies & TV. He didn't start reading manga again until he decided to make his own manga (i.e. the late 70s), so while he was naturally inspired the works of Tezuka as a child (though, to be fair, just about everyone in Japan was inspired by Tezuka) his influences as an adult were technically the very people he was working alongside/against in Jump!

He found a lifelong friend in Masakazu Katsura, due to them having the same editor, Kazuhiko Torishima (immortalized as the villainous Dr. Mashirito in Dr. Slump). He was in awe of the success that Masami Kurumada was having with Ring ni Kakero & Fuma no Kojirou, and wished he could muster even 1/10 of the intensity of Kurumada in his own works. Yoshinori Nakai, the artist half of Yudetamago, admitted following Toriyama's death that the three of them originally were close buds, sharing drawings with each other, until Nakai started seeing Toriyama as a rival, due to how quickly he saw success (Dr. Slump was made into an anime after only a year, while Kinnikuman took four years), so there was someone for Toriyama to compete with.

While Toriyama came into manga with little direct inspiration, it's easy to see that he so much talent around him to look at for inspiration (& competition). It's an element of Toriyama that, unfortunately, isn't talked about much, as people tend to focus solely on the influence he had on others. When people started sharing that cover of Jump one issue prior to Dr. Slump's debut as a way of showcasing how Toriyama completely changed the face of Jump with Dr. Slump, it was generally done so as a way to denigrate the titles & mangaka that came before him, despite those very people being the ones that Toriyama had to look up to while making Dr. Slump, since he didn't really have much prior inspiration before that, outside of his memories of reading manga as a child.

It's why I find Dragon Ball so interesting from a historical & serialization perspective, because while it was obviously success & inspirational from the beginning, a number of the elements that people associate with DB today as being so iconic, particularly some the stuff covered in Dragon Ball Z, very much look to have been influenced by Kurumada's Saint Seiya, despite DB debuting first. The biggest one would easily be the visual of the Super Saiyan, i.e. a yellow/golden tinged power up that makes certain characters more powerful than before, which came after Saint Seiya's "Power of Gold", i.e. a yellow/golden tinged power up that makes certain characters more powerful than before; in fact, Goku didn't first turn Super Saiyan until after Saint Seiya had ended. Toriyama was always looking at what the people he admired, i.e. his fellow Jump mangaka, were doing for inspiration, while also making sure to implement those ideas in their own unique ways, to some extent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tintor2



Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 1824
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:49 am Reply with quote
BadNewsBlues wrote:
If he had a problem with that why did he write Goku the way he wrote him in the first half of the original manga? Where Goku more or less had heroic qualities.

- Courageous
- Defends the weak
- Helps those in trouble
- Selfless
- Saves the world sometimes secondary to a primary purpose but still.

Any of the more dubious things he did like throwing Gohan to Cell, helping irredeemable people with body counts he’s also to blame for that.


Probably the most controversial is when Goku had the potential to save the world from the beginning just by killing the Gero before the androids are awaken but he wanted to fight them too. However, when Cell and the others awake everybody starts having second thoughts.

I guess Goku's character isn't that consistent. Proabably the most notable difference is how he reacted to Raditz; upon hearing there are two stronger Saiyans, Goku admits being afraid rather excited and is willing to pull any trick with Piccolo to kill Raditz and save his son. There is also the case of Goku having mercy with Frieza after Krillin's death too in contrast to how happy he was when he avenged the first death in the classic series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Handsome



Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 279
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:37 am Reply with quote
BadNewsBlues wrote:
If he had a problem with that why did he write Goku the way he wrote him in the first half of the original manga? Where Goku more or less had heroic qualities.

- Courageous
- Defends the weak
- Helps those in trouble
- Selfless
- Saves the world sometimes secondary to a primary purpose but still.


In the original manga, Goku is a dumb, very naive, unfit for society, country boy with no manners, no heroic qualities, he just did whatever he wanted and nobody could stop him. He was easily fooled and Bulma had to tell him to come save her before he even did anything.

The English localizations of the series, especially Z, made Goku alot smarter and more heroic than he actually is. Usually if Goku does something, it's something that benefits him or it's just to pay back a debt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 5925
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:27 pm Reply with quote
tintor2 wrote:
Probably the most controversial is when Goku had the potential to save the world from the beginning just by killing the Gero before the androids are awaken but he wanted to fight them too. However, when Cell and the others awake everybody starts having second thoughts.


To be pretty fair and maybe I must’ve glossed over it in all the times I’ve gone through the Red Ribbon Army Arc but Gero was never shown in the original DragonBall so Goku wouldn’t have known which guy to take out. Hell he barely knew who the key members of The Red Ribbon Army were or rather who was remaining before he raided their headquarters.

Chris Handsome wrote:
In the original manga, Goku is a dumb, very naive, unfit for society, country boy with no manners, no heroic qualities, he just did whatever he wanted and nobody could stop him. He was easily fooled and Bulma had to tell him to come save her before he even did anything.


And with that in mind and like I said before. I don’t know why he’d take issue with the way Goku’s character was altered elsewhere when again he gave him all those morally dubious character traits to begin with.

Like what metaphor would apply here.

“The Calls Coming From Inside The House?”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Avec ou Nous



Joined: 17 Feb 2023
Posts: 105
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:22 pm Reply with quote
tintor2 wrote:
Considering Goku is really Toriyama's legacy, I wonder Super will keep using him or change to somebody else.


Ideally they'll stop making Dragonball and milking it and Daima will be the swansong of the franchise outside new video games and merchandise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 5925
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:41 am Reply with quote
Avec ou Nous wrote:
Ideally they'll stop making Dragonball and milking it and Daima will be the swansong of the franchise outside new video games and merchandise.


You do know that making new video games and merchandise would still be considered “milking it” right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Philville



Joined: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 158
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:39 pm Reply with quote
Lord Geo wrote:
It's why I find Dragon Ball so interesting from a historical & serialization perspective, because while it was obviously success & inspirational from the beginning, a number of the elements that people associate with DB today as being so iconic, particularly some the stuff covered in Dragon Ball Z, very much look to have been influenced by Kurumada's Saint Seiya, despite DB debuting first. The biggest one would easily be the visual of the Super Saiyan, i.e. a yellow/golden tinged power up that makes certain characters more powerful than before, which came after Saint Seiya's "Power of Gold", i.e. a yellow/golden tinged power up that makes certain characters more powerful than before; in fact, Goku didn't first turn Super Saiyan until after Saint Seiya had ended. Toriyama was always looking at what the people he admired, i.e. his fellow Jump mangaka, were doing for inspiration, while also making sure to implement those ideas in their own unique ways, to some extent.


This is accurate. As a kid I grew up watching both Saint Seiya and Dragon Ball Z (as well as Fist of the North Star and Sailor Moon) on Saturday mornings on French TV -- via the legendary Club Dorothée program, which is also where President Macron watched Dragon Ball -- in the early to mid 90s, and the influence which Saint Seiya had on Dragon Ball Z was pretty obvious when watching them around the same time. For the record, I loved both equally, and I still consider these two to be among my favorite anime series, warts and all (although I've always found Saint Seiya's music superior). Someone posted an interesting comment in the thread on the tributes to Toriyama mentioning how he explicitly credited the influence of Kurumada on his manga, and how the latter was quite humble when asked whether he felt he needed to compete with Toriyama.

Lord Geo wrote:
Quote:
Akira Toriyama was inspired by the works of amazing mangaka like Osamu Tezuka.
While Toriyama came into manga with little direct inspiration, it's easy to see that he so much talent around him to look at for inspiration (& competition). It's an element of Toriyama that, unfortunately, isn't talked about much, as people tend to focus solely on the influence he had on others.


Yes, but to be fair (using the above example as a point of reference) Saint Seiya's cultural impact has been negligible on a global scale in direct comparison (hence the many misguided recent attempts to make it a successful franchise in the US). It has its die-hard fans in Japan, South America, France and Italy to this day, but it's pretty clear why Toriyama is considered so influential on the shōnen genre as a whole, as opposed to many of the people he was inspired by. I would argue that this is even the case in France, which is the world's largest manga importer (there's an interesting English article on the topic in The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/mar/29/france-manga-anime-murakami-macron). Toriyama found a winning formula and arguably pulled it off better than the competition (studio interference aside), even if haters gonna hate. While he may not have agreed with the directions the anime took the source material, there is no doubt that it gave his work exposure and influence it probably wouldn't have had otherwise (I for one only ended up reading the manga much later, when I was in high school, despite having grown up with the anime).

tintor2 wrote:
I guess Goku's character isn't that consistent. Proabably the most notable difference is how he reacted to Raditz; upon hearing there are two stronger Saiyans, Goku admits being afraid rather excited and is willing to pull any trick with Piccolo to kill Raditz and save his son. There is also the case of Goku having mercy with Frieza after Krillin's death too in contrast to how happy he was when he avenged the first death in the classic series.


I definitely agree that there are inconsistencies as far as the characterization is concerned, but I didn't find it particularly surprising that Goku wanted to save his son. In fact, embracing his role as a parent at the start of DBZ is one of the main indicators that Goku had somewhat matured and accepted a new sense of responsibility (when compared to the boy Goku which Chris Handsome described above). If anything, that coherent character arc was spoiled by later decisions, which are arguably more inconsistent (let's not get started on Dragon Ball Super).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lord Geo



Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 2547
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 8:38 pm Reply with quote
Philville wrote:
Yes, but to be fair (using the above example as a point of reference) Saint Seiya's cultural impact has been negligible on a global scale in direct comparison (hence the many misguided recent attempts to make it a successful franchise in the US). It has its die-hard fans in Japan, South America, France and Italy to this day, but it's pretty clear why Toriyama is considered so influential on the shōnen genre as a whole, as opposed to many of the people he was inspired by. I would argue that this is even the case in France, which is the world's largest manga importer (there's an interesting English article on the topic in The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/mar/29/france-manga-anime-murakami-macron). Toriyama found a winning formula and arguably pulled it off better than the competition (studio interference aside), even if haters gonna hate. While he may not have agreed with the directions the anime took the source material, there is no doubt that it gave his work exposure and influence it probably wouldn't have had otherwise (I for one only ended up reading the manga much later, when I was in high school, despite having grown up with the anime).


That last line you're quoting from me was me simply pointing out that people tend to focus so much on Toriyama's impact & influence that it inadvertently comes off as though they believe that Toriyama seemingly came from out of nowhere & came up with everything he did out of the blue. That's why the piece here only brought up Osamu Tezuka, because what Toriyama's influences were are next to unknown to most people, so they go with the obvious one (i.e. the guy who essentially influenced everyone in manga) & leave it at that.

I just wanted to bring to light Toriyama's (admittedly unique, in origin) set of inspirations & influences that he had, since pretty much no one else would. Yes, his impact was greater than others around the world, but that doesn't mean that we should act like he came up with everything from out of nowhere, like people tend to do, even if accidentally. Everyone has a past, but Toriyama's own is rarely spoken of, because people just want to talk about how he's everyone else's past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Philville



Joined: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 158
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:09 pm Reply with quote
Lord Geo wrote:
That last line you're quoting from me was me simply pointing out that people tend to focus so much on Toriyama's impact & influence that it inadvertently comes off as though they believe that Toriyama seemingly came from out of nowhere & came up with everything he did out of the blue. That's why the piece here only brought up Osamu Tezuka, because what Toriyama's influences were are next to unknown to most people, so they go with the obvious one (i.e. the guy who essentially influenced everyone in manga) & leave it at that.

I just wanted to bring to light Toriyama's (admittedly unique, in origin) set of inspirations & influences that he had, since pretty much no one else would. Yes, his impact was greater than others around the world, but that doesn't mean that we should act like he came up with everything from out of nowhere, like people tend to do, even if accidentally. Everyone has a past, but Toriyama's own is rarely spoken of, because people just want to talk about how he's everyone else's past.


I absolutely see where you're coming from and it is important for people to realize that Toriyama's work wasn't created in a vacuum (no art is, after all). As I've said, I agree about the influence of Kurumada, for one, and his friendship with other mangaka in the early days of his career is increasingly coming to light. But that obviously doesn't in any way diminish his own creative contribution to manga and anime as a whole and, as some of the tributes by other creators have shown, many fans and artists still see him as a gold standard for the shonen genre or as a kind of unsurpassed master, as this piece suggests. The mystique he created around his person (including his lack of public appearances) probably also contributed significantly to his monolithic, larger-than-life reputation. It may be exaggerated, but I don't think it's undeserved. There are definitely many artists who don't get the recognition they deserve, but that's a different story.

In many ways, that's what this piece is about; our legacy, and how we can't really control the reception of our art, but just need to stick to our guns and do the things we feel inspired to do. Maybe I'm being naïve, considering the franchise's net worth, but I'd like to think that at the end of the day Toriyama had some of the (decidedly non-heroic) playfulness, carefreeness and recklessness we find in Goku, and that he was following his heart and desire to have fun when creating this world, without thinking about the impact it would have on the industry. I think that kind of authenticity (especially in the early days of DB and DBZ) is something that viewers and readers can instantly feel and connect with, even if Toriyama was influenced by others and his own work in turn became the source of countless derivative shonen tropes. All things considered, regardless of its influences (and faults), I see a work like Dragon Ball as being infinitely more original than many of the shonen series that followed (not to speak of the tsunami of cookie-cutter isekai series of the last couple of years).

To put it differently, there’s an (ironically, influential) psychological concept from the 70s in literary theory, known as The Anxiety of Influence, which I was reminded of when reading this passage:

Quote:
A titan in the creative space who brought the world together in a shared love of action, art, and comedy. A man whose influence impacts so many people in so many visible and invisible ways. And what are we to do, as fellow creators who want to impact the world with our work? He changed the lives of tens of millions of people - how can we measure up to that kind of legacy, even a little bit? How can you compete with that? That kind of influence and creativity can seem nearly divine. You can't measure up to Akira Toriyama – no one can beat Goku, it seems.


The thing that strikes me with Toriyama is how his own work appears to be completely free of this anxiety of influence. You can feel that he’s just having fun, combining elements from various sources and making them his own. One of the few artists in the same genre that I can think of who has that kind of referential but unchained creativity is, perhaps unsurprisingly, Oda.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aster97



Joined: 27 Apr 2022
Posts: 159
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2024 12:20 pm Reply with quote
this was a very nice article, thank you for writing it. Dragon ball is my favorite anime, so when i saw how short the article was that announced his death on the home page, i was very shocked and sad. but i see now that write just put the bare minimum to announce the death to make room for all the incoming articles going deeper details and depth of his life and work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Wily



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 261
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2024 1:11 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
When we shout Kamehameha, we speak the same tongue.


This is deep in a way I never thought about. Like, for a long time, people hated on (and still do) dubs for changing things about DB. How they'd change characters (making Goku more like Superman during some scenes like his initial Super Saiyan reveal) or of course things like attack names (Special Beam Cannon, etc). But I've never seen or heard one localization in any language that changes Kamehameha. It's surprisingly deep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group